In re Holzmaister

S.D. New York

In re Holzmaister

61 F. 645, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2823

DecidedMay 11, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 61 F. 645 (In re Holzmaister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Holzmaister, 61 F. 645, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2823 (S.D.N.Y. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge

(after stating the facts). Although “schmaschen” gloves are so often of lamb origin that this term is indicative of that origin, it is not universally so, nor far enough so to exclude kid origin. This leaves room for calling these gloves of kid origin “schmaschen” gloves without exposing them to an.additional high duty for representing them to be of too low a grade. The judgment of the board of appraisers is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WHEELER, District Judge

(after stating the facts). Although “schmaschen” gloves are so often of lamb origin that this term is indicative of that origin, it is not universally so, nor far enough so to exclude kid origin. This leaves room for calling these gloves of kid origin “schmaschen” gloves without exposing them to an.additional high duty for representing them to be of too low a grade. The judgment of the board of appraisers is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 F. 645, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-holzmaister-nysd-1894.