In Re Holt Texas, LTD D/B/A Holt Cat v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-26-00001-CV

IN RE HOLT TEXAS, LTD D/B/A HOLT CAT

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2026

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On December 31, 2025, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On January 7, 2026,

we requested a response. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator

can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2)

there is no adequate remedy by way of appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex.

1992) (orig. proceeding). After considering the petition, the record, real parties in interest’s

response, and relator’s reply this court concludes relator did not establish that it is entitled to the

relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2025CI19911, styled Holt Texas, LTD., dba HOLT CAT v. Turner 1

Contracting, Inc., and Steven L. Turner, pending in the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.