In re Holt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Holt

724 A.2d 928

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 11, 1999

DocketNo. 479 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 724 A.2d 928 (In re Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Holt, 724 A.2d 928 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 1999, Carl Thomas Holt having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of Connecticut for a period of five years by Order of the Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk, dated August 31, 1998; the said Carl Thomas Holt having been directed on December 8,1998, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Carl Thomas Holt is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of five years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 1999, Carl Thomas Holt having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of Connecticut for a period of five years by Order of the Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk, dated August 31, 1998; the said Carl Thomas Holt having been directed on December 8,1998, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Carl Thomas Holt is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of five years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

724 A.2d 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-holt-pa-1999.