In re Holmes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Holmes

792 S.E.2d 239, 418 S.C. 281, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 357

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 24, 2016·No. Appellate Case No. 2016-002057·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

Within fifteen (15) days of this order, respondent shall serve and file the affidavit required by Rule 30, RLDE. Should respondent fail to timely file the required affidavit, respondent may be held in civil and/or criminal contempt of this Court as provided by Rule 30, RLDE.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

Within fifteen (15) days of this order, respondent shall serve and file the affidavit required by Rule 30, RLDE. Should respondent fail to timely file the required affidavit, respondent may be held in civil and/or criminal contempt of this Court as provided by Rule 30, RLDE.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

In re Holmes, 792 S.E.2d 239, 418 S.C. 281, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 357 (S.C. 2016).

Pincite

792 S.E.2d 239 (In re Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related