In re Holmes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Holmes

792 S.E.2d 239, 418 S.C. 281, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 357

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedOctober 24, 2016

DocketAppellate Case No. 2016-002057

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 792 S.E.2d 239 (In re Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Holmes, 792 S.E.2d 239, 418 S.C. 281, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 357 (S.C. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

Within fifteen (15) days of this order, respondent shall serve and file the affidavit required by Rule 30, RLDE. Should respondent fail to timely file the required affidavit, respondent may be held in civil and/or criminal contempt of this Court as provided by Rule 30, RLDE.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI