In Re Holmes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In Re Holmes

723 S.E.2d 809, 396 S.C. 597, 2012 WL 1134809, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 113

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJanuary 25, 2012

Docket2012-01-25-01

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 723 S.E.2d 809 (In Re Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Holmes, 723 S.E.2d 809, 396 S.C. 597, 2012 WL 1134809, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 113 (S.C. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On December 27, 2011, respondent was arrested and charged with possession with intent to distribute heroin. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel petitions the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent opposes the petition. The petition is granted.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is hereby enjoined from access to any trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts) respondent may maintain.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI