In Re Holmes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In Re Holmes

723 S.E.2d 809, 396 S.C. 597, 2012 WL 1134809, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 113

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 25, 2012·No. 2012-01-25-01·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

On December 27, 2011, respondent was arrested and charged with possession with intent to distribute heroin. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel petitions the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent opposes the petition. The petition is granted.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is hereby enjoined from access to any trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts) respondent may maintain.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On December 27, 2011, respondent was arrested and charged with possession with intent to distribute heroin. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel petitions the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent opposes the petition. The petition is granted.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is hereby enjoined from access to any trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts) respondent may maintain.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

In Re Holmes, 723 S.E.2d 809, 396 S.C. 597, 2012 WL 1134809, 2012 S.C. LEXIS 113 (S.C. 2012).

Pincite

723 S.E.2d 809 (In Re Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related