In re Holman

690 A.2d 591, 148 N.J. 428, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 102
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 21, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 690 A.2d 591 (In re Holman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Holman, 690 A.2d 591, 148 N.J. 428, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 102 (N.J. 1997).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Supreme Court recommending that A. ROBERT HOLMAN, III, of JERSEY CITY, be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that A. ROBERT HOLMAN, III, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by A. ROBERT HOLMAN, III, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that A. ROBERT HOLMAN, III, show cause before this Court on April 28, 1997, at 2:00 p.m., Supreme Court courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, New Jersey, why his temporary suspension and the restraints herein should not continue pending final disposition of any ethics proceedings pending against him and further why the funds restrained from disbursement should not be transmitted by the financial institu[429]*429tions who are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending the •further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, present this matter to the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that A. ROBERT HOLMAN, III, be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
690 A.2d 591, 148 N.J. 428, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-holman-nj-1997.