in Re: Hollman Court Systems, Inc. D/B/A Hollman Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: May 25, 2021
• Docket: 05-21-00184-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed May 25, 2021

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00184-CV

IN RE HOLLMAN COURT SYSTEMS, INC. D/B/A HOLLMAN INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14703

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Smith Opinion by Justice Reichek Relator’s March 25, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial

court’s vacatur of a prior interlocutory order issued by a predecessor judge. Relator

asks us to compel the court to rescind the vacatur, or, in the alternative, direct the

court to rule on certain pending motions.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court has

clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In

re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

After reviewing the petition and record, we conclude that relator has failed to show an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a).

/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE

210184F.P05

–2–