In re Holliday

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Holliday

193 So. 3d 124, 2016 La. LEXIS 1296, 2016 WL 3129116

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 27, 2016

DocketNo. 2016-B-0686

StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 3d 124 (In re Holliday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Holliday, 193 So. 3d 124, 2016 La. LEXIS 1296, 2016 WL 3129116 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was convicted of domestic abuse battery in June 2015. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that his conduct violated Rule 8.4(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Stephen J. Holliday, Louisiana Bar Roll number 23496, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of- this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was convicted of domestic abuse battery in June 2015. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that his conduct violated Rule 8.4(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Stephen J. Holliday, Louisiana Bar Roll number 23496, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of- this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 So. 3d 124, 2016 La. LEXIS 1296, 2016 WL 3129116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-holliday-la-2016.