in Re Hollandia B v. A/K/A Bailey Technogroup Steel & Cranes, B v.
Opinion
Opinion issued March 14, 2013.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00063-CV ——————————— IN RE HOLLANDIA B.V. A/K/A BAILEY TECHNOGROUP STEEL & CRANES, B.V., Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
By petition for writ of mandamus, Hollandia B.V. a/k/a Bailey Technogroup
Steel & Cranes, B.V. asked this Court to compel the trial court to conduct a
hearing and rule on Hollandia’s special appearance. Hollandia has informed the
Court that, during the pendency of this original proceeding, the trial court granted
1 The underlying case is Vinson v. GlobalSantaFe Corp. et al., No. 2005-34664 in the 152 District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Robert Schaffer presiding. the special appearance and dismissed the case against Hollandia with prejudice.
Accordingly, Hollandia’s complaints regarding the trial court’s failure to act are
moot, and we dismiss the petition.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Hollandia B v. A/K/A Bailey Technogroup Steel & Cranes, B v. (in Re Hollandia B v. A/K/A Bailey Technogroup Steel & Cranes, B v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.