In Re Holford

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

In Re Holford

149 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 726

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 1, 1900

DocketNo. A-2253.

StatusPublished

This text of 149 P. 1196 (In Re Holford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Holford, 149 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 726 (Okla. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application in habeas corpus brought by Perry Wales Holford, alleging that Mrs. Maurine Holford, his wife, is illegally restrained of her liberty and confined in the Oklahoma State *727 Training School for Girls, at Oklahoma City, by Mrs. Angie A. Russel, superintendent of said state training school, and that she is held in custody under and by virtue of a commitment of the county court of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, confining her in said institution as a juvenile offender. On the filing of the petition the writ issued. On the return day the respondent appeared as commanded. The cause coming on for hearing, and the same being duly presented to the court, it is by the court ordered that the writ -be discharged and the said Mrs. Maurine Iiolford be remanded to the custody of the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an application in habeas corpus brought by Perry Wales Holford, alleging that Mrs. Maurine Holford, his wife, is illegally restrained of her liberty and confined in the Oklahoma State *727 Training School for Girls, at Oklahoma City, by Mrs. Angie A. Russel, superintendent of said state training school, and that she is held in custody under and by virtue of a commitment of the county court of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, confining her in said institution as a juvenile offender. On the filing of the petition the writ issued. On the return day the respondent appeared as commanded. The cause coming on for hearing, and the same being duly presented to the court, it is by the court ordered that the writ -be discharged and the said Mrs. Maurine Iiolford be remanded to the custody of the respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-holford-oklacrimapp-1900.