In re Holden
240 A.D. 906
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Holden. Read the opinion of the Court — 243 A.D. 543 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1933·Published
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted and the following question certified: On the facts presented did the Surrogate’s Court have jurisdiction and authority to direct the receiver of the First National Bank in Mamaroneck to pay over to the guardian and “ co-guardian ” of the infant the money deposited in the bank to their account? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ. [See ante, p. 845.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Holden, 240 A.D. 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 906 (In re Holden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.