In re Hojer's Estate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Hojer's Estate

95 N.Y.S. 1136

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 31, 1905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.,

We think the parties are entitled to an accounting in the Surrogate’s Court, notwithstanding the pendency of that action, and that the case of Ludwig v. Bungart, 48 App. Div. 613, 63 N. Y. Supp. 91, cited by the learned surrogate, is not controlling under these circumstances. Qrder dismissing proceedings reversed, and the matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county for disposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.,

We think the parties are entitled to an accounting in the Surrogate’s Court, notwithstanding the pendency of that action, and that the case of Ludwig v. Bungart, 48 App. Div. 613, 63 N. Y. Supp. 91, cited by the learned surrogate, is not controlling under these circumstances. Qrder dismissing proceedings reversed, and the matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county for disposition.

In re Hojer's Estate, 95 N.Y.S. 1136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

95 N.Y.S. 1136 (In re Hojer's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related