In re Hoffmann

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Hoffmann

712 A.2d 1090, 154 N.J. 259, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 452

DecidedMay 21, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 712 A.2d 1090 (In re Hoffmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hoffmann, 712 A.2d 1090, 154 N.J. 259, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 452 (N.J. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on April 3, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that HOWARD J. HOFF-MANN of WEST NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HOWARD J. HOFFMANN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[260]*260ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on April 3, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that HOWARD J. HOFF-MANN of WEST NEW YORK, NEW JERSEY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1976, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HOWARD J. HOFFMANN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[260]*260ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

712 A.2d 1090, 154 N.J. 259, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hoffmann-nj-1998.