In re Hoffman
This text of 2011 Ohio 4266 (In re Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as In re Hoffman, 2011-Ohio-4266.]
Court of Claims of Ohio Victims of Crime Division The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Fourth Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9860 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us
IN RE: STANLY L. HOFFMAN
STANLY L. HOFFMAN
Applicant
Case No. V2011-60115
Commissioners: Karl C. Kerschner, Presiding Susan G. Sheridan E. Joel Wesp
ORDER OF A THREE- COMMISSIONER PANEL
{1}On November 24, 2010, the applicant, Stanly Hoffman, filed a compensation application as the result of an assault which occurred on April 5, 2010. On December 6, 2010, the Attorney General issued a finding of fact and decision denying the applicant’s claim pursuant to R.C. 2743.60(E)(1)(a), since the applicant was convicted of a felony, tampering with records on August 24, 2009. The felony conviction was within ten years of the occurrence of the criminally injurious conduct. On December 13, 2010, the applicant filed a request for reconsideration. On January 31, 2011, the Attorney General rendered a Final Decision finding no reason to modify the initial decision. On February 7, 2011, the applicant filed a notice of appeal from the January 31, 2011 Final Decision of the Attorney General. Hence, a hearing was held on this matter on May 4, 2011 at 10:20 A.M. {2}The applicant appeared at the hearing, while Assistant Attorney General Melissa Montgomery appeared on behalf of the state of Ohio. {3}The applicant stated he was severely beaten by fellow inmates on April 5, 2010, while he was incarcerated at the Marion Correctional Institution. The applicant Case No. V2011-60115 - 2 - ORDER
acknowledged that he had previously been convicted of a felony and pursuant to R.C. 2743.60(E)(1)(a) he is barred from receiving an award of reparations. Case No. V2011-60115 - 3 - ORDER
{4}The Attorney General stated that R.C. 2743.60(E)(1)(a) is clear and no exceptions are permitted. Accordingly, the Attorney General’s Final Decision should be affirmed. Whereupon, the hearing was concluded. {5}R.C. 2743.60(E)(1)(a) states: “(E)(1) Except as otherwise provided in division (E)(2) of this section, the attorney general, a panel of commissioners, or a judge of the court of claims shall not make an award to a claimant if any of the following applies: “(a) The victim was convicted of a felony within ten years prior to the criminally injurious conduct that gave rise to the claim or is convicted of a felony during the pendency of the claim.” {6}From review of the case file and upon full and careful consideration given to the testimony of the applicant and the statement of the Attorney General, we find the applicant’s claim should be denied pursuant to R.C. 2743.60(E)(1)(a), due to his felony conviction which was within ten years of the criminally injurious conduct. Therefore, the January 31, 2011 Final Decision of the Attorney General is affirmed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT {7}1) The January 31, 2011 decision of the Attorney General is AFFIRMED; {8}2) This claim is DENIED and judgment is rendered for the state of Ohio; Case No. V2011-60115 - 4 - ORDER
{9}3) Costs are assumed by the court of claims victims of crime fund.
_______________________________________ KARL C. KERSCHNER Presiding Commissioner
_______________________________________ SUSAN G. SHERIDAN Commissioner
_______________________________________ E. JOEL WESP Commissioner
ID #I:\VICTIMS\2011\60115\V2011-60115 Hoffman.wpd\DRB-tad A copy of the foregoing was personally served upon the Attorney General and sent by regular mail to Marion County Prosecuting Attorney and to: Filed 6-24-11 Jr. Vol. 2279, Pgs. 64-66 Sent to S.C. Reporter 8-23-11
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 4266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hoffman-ohioctcl-2011.