In re Hoffberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Hoffberg

881 A.2d 1240, 185 N.J. 131, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1116

DecidedSeptember 20, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 881 A.2d 1240 (In re Hoffberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hoffberg, 881 A.2d 1240, 185 N.J. 131, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1116 (N.J. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-073, concluding that BARRY A. HOFF-BERG of NEW YORK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1993, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver funds to client or third person), RPC 1.15(d), Rule l:21-6(a) and (b) (failing to maintain required New Jersey trust and business accounts), and RPC 5.5(a) (unauthorized practice of law), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BARRY A. HOFFBERG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-073, concluding that BARRY A. HOFF-BERG of NEW YORK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1993, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver funds to client or third person), RPC 1.15(d), Rule l:21-6(a) and (b) (failing to maintain required New Jersey trust and business accounts), and RPC 5.5(a) (unauthorized practice of law), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BARRY A. HOFFBERG is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

881 A.2d 1240, 185 N.J. 131, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hoffberg-nj-2005.