In re Hoerst

638 A.2d 134, 135 N.J. 84, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 167
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 10, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 638 A.2d 134 (In re Hoerst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hoerst, 638 A.2d 134, 135 N.J. 84, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 167 (N.J. 1994).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the motion of FRANK J. HOERST, III, for an extension of the effective date of the suspension from practice imposed by the Supreme Court in its Order of February 18, 1994, and the Court having treated the application as a motion for a stay of the effective date of its Order, and the Office of Attorney Ethics having interposed no objection to the motion, and good cause appearing;

[85]*85It is ORDERED that the motion for a stay of the effective date of respondent’s suspension from practice is granted, the six-month suspension from practice to begin April 1, 1994, and to continue until the further Order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
638 A.2d 134, 135 N.J. 84, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hoerst-nj-1994.