In re Hoeffner
This text of 204 A.D.2d 721 (In re Hoeffner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 1809 to determine the validity of a claim, the claimant appeals from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.), dated August 20, 1992, as, in effect, granted the petition and dismissed the claim.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by the appellant personally.
The Surrogate properly concluded that the claimant executed a valid release which served to bar her belated claim for interest on a bequest. Thus, her claim was properly dismissed. Balletta, J. P., Copertino, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D.2d 721, 614 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hoeffner-nyappdiv-1994.