In re Hodge
This text of 143 A.3d 380 (In re Hodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2016, the Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 123 and for a Judicial Exemption Pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 219 is GRANTED. Petitioner is immediately reinstated to active status per Rule 219, as is similarly provided for judges who sit within the [381]*381Commonwealth. Any and all other reinstatement requirements are waived.
To the extent Petitioner remains an active or senior member of the judiciary, see Pa.R.C.L.E. 102; Pa.C.L.E. Bd. Reg. § 1, he shall not be subject to annual CLE requirements. If Petitioner returns to active lawyer status, such requirements shall resume, in accordance with Section 6(c) of the Continuing Legal Education Board Regulations. See Pa.C.L.E. Bd. Reg. § 6(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 A.3d 380, 636 Pa. 382, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1548, 2016 WL 3960084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hodge-pa-2016.