In re Hodesblatt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Hodesblatt

765 A.2d 1115

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 22, 2001

DocketNo. 919, Disciplinary Docket No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 765 A.2d 1115 (In re Hodesblatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hodesblatt, 765 A.2d 1115 (Pa. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2001, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated November 28, 2000, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2001, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated November 28, 2000, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

765 A.2d 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hodesblatt-pa-2001.