In re Hochstein
This text of 102 A.D.2d 405 (In re Hochstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Respondent Ralph Hochstein was admitted to practice in the Second Department on December 17,1969. Respondent acknowledges that he is the subject of an investigation by the petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee, and admits that he converted to his own use the sum of $26,470.96 held by him in escrow on behalf of his client.
In his affidavit, respondent Hochstein tenders his resignation pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.11. He states that his resignation is made voluntarily and that he is fully aware of the implications and consequences of his resignation. He admits that if a disciplinary proceeding were commenced against him based upon the charge of misconduct which has been filed and which is the subject of the investigation, he could not successfully defend himself on the merits.
Under the circumstances, respondent’s resignation as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be filed; and it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law.
[406]*406Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Silverman and Alexander, JJ., concur.
Respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York, effective June 28, 1984.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 A.D.2d 405, 477 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hochstein-nyappdiv-1984.