In re Hochberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Hochberg

45 A.D.2d 467, 359 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4121

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 19, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.2d 467 (In re Hochberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hochberg, 45 A.D.2d 467, 359 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Department on June 29,1954.

He was convicted in the Supreme Court, New York County, of the crime of larceny in the second degree, following his plea of guilty to the first count of an indictment which charged him with five counts of larceny in the second degree. Such crime is a felony (Penal Law, § 155.35).

Petitioner, the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, by this petition, seeks to have respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys. Such action is mandatory. (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd. 4; Matter of Lindenauer, 41 A D 2d 400.)

[468]*468The petition should be granted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Markewich, J. P., Lupiano, Steuer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI