In re Hobson

62 N.E.2d 516, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 216
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 24, 1945
DocketNo. 3786
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 N.E.2d 516 (In re Hobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hobson, 62 N.E.2d 516, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 216 (Ohio Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

We are of the opinion the Court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine the issues of law raised in this case, the question having been decided by this Court in Baker v State, 17 Abs 384.

The appeal is ordered dismissed.

HORNBECK, P. J.,. GEIGER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ON APPLICATION FOE REHEARING

Decided April 7, 1945.

Submitted on application for rehearing.

We recognize that the jurisdictional question presented in this matter is not free from doubt and there is conflict of [217]*217our decision with that in another jurisdiction and diversity even in our own jurisdiction. However, it is our best judgment that the correct determination of the matter is found in Baker v State, 17 Abs 384, and In re Griffin, 73 Oh Ap 110, which we have followed in at least three other cases in the jurisdiction.

We will certify to the Supreme Court that our judgment in the instant appeal is in conflict with In re Antean, 67 Oh Ap 117, and we trust that the matter will be presented to the Supreme Court where it will be Anally adjudicated.

HORNBECK, P. J„ GEIGER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State, Ex Rel. Clark v. Allaman
90 N.E.2d 394 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 N.E.2d 516, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hobson-ohioctapp-1945.