In re Hobson
This text of 670 A.2d 1051 (In re Hobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Supreme Court on October 10,1995, having remanded this matter to the District IV Fee Arbitration Committee for reconsideration of the reasonableness of a fee charged by respondent, WILLIAM D. HOBSON of COLLINGSWOOD;
And the Order of remand having been conditioned on respondent’s posting forthwith security for the previous fee award to his clients, the security to be in a form satisfactory to the Office of Attorney Ethics;
And the Office of Attorney Ethics having reported to the Court that respondent has failed to post security satisfactory to the Office of Attorney Ethics;
And good cause appearing;
[304]*304It is ORDERED that the Order remanding this matter to the District IV Fee Arbitration Committee is hereby vacated; and it is further
• ORDERED that WILLIAM D. HOBSON is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until further Order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 A.2d 1051, 143 N.J. 303, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hobson-nj-1996.