In re H.N.D.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re H.N.D.

704 S.E.2d 510, 364 N.C. 597, 2010 N.C. LEXIS 1076

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 20, 2010·No. No. 359A10·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER-CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED.

[598] PENNY CUMMINGS v. AGNES ORTEGA, M.D. and WOMEN’S HEALTH CARE SPECIALISTS

) ) ) ) ) )

ORDER

No. 417P10

The defendant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is allowed on the following issue only: “Did the trial court err by relying on evidence contained within juror affidavits to grant plaintiff a new trial?”

By order of the Court in Conference, this 15th day of December, 2010.

Hudson. J.

For the Court

[599] [[Image here]]

[600] [[Image here]]

[601] [[Image here]]

[602] [[Image here]]

[603] [[Image here]]

[604] [[Image here]]

[605] [[Image here]]

[606] [[Image here]]

[607] [[Image here]]

[608] [[Image here]]

[609] [[Image here]]

[610] [[Image here]]

[611] [[Image here]]

[612] [[Image here]]

[613] [[Image here]]

[614] [[Image here]]

[615] [[Image here]]

[616] [[Image here]]

[617] [[Image here]]

[618] [[Image here]]

[619] [[Image here]]

[620] [[Image here]]

[621] [[Image here]]

[622] [[Image here]]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI