in Re Hiwot Dinkale
This text of in Re Hiwot Dinkale (in Re Hiwot Dinkale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued November 3, 2022
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00803-CV ——————————— IN RE HIWOT DINKALE, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Hiwot Dinkale, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, challenging
the trial court’s rulings on motions to compel and a motion for continuance.*
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We
dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Hightower.
* The underlying case is Hiwot Dinkale v. 4M Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C., RX Compounding Solutions, L.L.C. d/b/a Pharmacare Plus Pharmacy, and Mohamed M. Mokbel, cause number 2018-56873, pending in the 334th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Dawn Rogers presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Hiwot Dinkale, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hiwot-dinkale-texapp-2022.