in Re Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 22, 2015·No. 14-15-00697-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 22, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00697-CV

IN RE HITACHI MEDICAL SYSTEMS AMERICA, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

125th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-15074

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 18, 2015, relator Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Kyle Carter, presiding judge of the 125th District Court of Harris County, to set aside his order denying relator’s motion to dismiss based on a forum-selection clause that relator asserts requires this suit to be filed in Ohio.

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will issue only if (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion and (2) the party requesting mandamus relief has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004).

On this record, relator has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Donovan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc., (Tex. 2015).

in Re Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. (in Re Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)