In re Hirsch
This text of 238 A.D. 570 (In re Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York on November 5, 1913, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Department.
On May 4, 1933, the respondent was convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York of the crime of grand larceny, second degree, which crime is a felony, and sentenced to imprisonment in the State prison.
Section 477 of the Judiciary Law provides: “ Any person being an attorney and counsellor-at-law, who shall be convicted of a felony, shall, upon such conviction, cease to be an attorney and counsellor-at-law or to be competent to practice law as such.”
Subdivision 3 of section 88 of the Judiciary Law provides: “ Whenever any attorney and counsellor-at-law shall be convicted of a felony, there may be presented to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court a certified or exemplified copy of the judgment of such conviction, and thereupon the name of the person so convicted shall, by order of the court, be stricken from the roll of attorneys.”
Respondent, therefore, must be disbarred.
Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Townley, JJ.
Respondent disbarred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 A.D. 570, 266 N.Y.S. 155, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hirsch-nyappdiv-1933.