In re Hirsch

905 A.2d 867, 188 N.J. 255, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1316
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 12, 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-047, concluding that LAN J. HIRSCH of HACKENSACK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.15(a) and (b) (failure to safekeep property) and RPC 3.4(c) (knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct is a censure;

And respondent through counsel having assented to the imposition of a censure;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that IAN J. HIRSCH is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hirsch, 905 A.2d 867, 188 N.J. 255, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1316 (N.J. 2006).

905 A.2d 867 (In re Hirsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.