In re Hirsch
This text of 87 F. 1005 (In re Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We concur in the opinion of the circuit judge dismissing the writ of habeas corpus, and therefore affirm the order appealed from. We do not, however, intend to decide that the writ of habeas corpus is the proper remedy to secure a review' of the judgment of the state court in punishing a wtitness for disobedience of its process of subpoena ad testificandum. See Ex parte Parks, 93 U. S. 18; In re Wood, 140 U. S. 278, 11 Sup. Ct. 738; In re Frederich, 149 U. S. 70, 13 Sup. Ct. 793; In re Tyler, 149 U. S. 180, 13 Sup. Ct. 785; Ex parte Crouch, 112 U. S. 178, 5 Sup. Ct. 96.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 F. 1005, 31 C.C.A. 350, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hirsch-ca2-1898.