In re Hingle
90 So. 3d 446, 2012 WL 2478171, 2012 La. LEXIS 1866
This text of 90 So. 3d 446 (In re Hingle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Hingle, 90 So. 3d 446, 2012 WL 2478171, 2012 La. LEXIS 1866 (La. 2012).
Opinion
In re Disciplinary Counsel; — Other; Applying For Findings and Recommendations (Readmission) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 06-DB-056.
Readmission denied. Petitioner may not reapply for readmission until at least three years have passed from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24(1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
90 So. 3d 446, 2012 WL 2478171, 2012 La. LEXIS 1866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hingle-la-2012.