In Re Himanshi Raizada v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 9, 2024·No. 14-23-00951-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 9, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00951-CV

IN RE HIMANSHI RAIZADA, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 387th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20-DCV-278410

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 20, 2023, relator Himanshi Raizada filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Janet Heppard, presiding judge of the 387th District Court of Fort Bend County, to “vacate her order confirming the arbitration award, and permit [relator] to have her challenges to the partition agreement tried in district court. . . .”

Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Himanshi Raizada v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

In Re Himanshi Raizada v. the State of Texas (In Re Himanshi Raizada v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.