In Re Himanshi Raizada v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Himanshi Raizada v. the State of Texas (In Re Himanshi Raizada v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 9, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00951-CV
IN RE HIMANSHI RAIZADA, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 387th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20-DCV-278410
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 20, 2023, relator Himanshi Raizada filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Janet Heppard, presiding judge of the 387th District Court of Fort Bend County, to “vacate her order confirming the arbitration award, and permit [relator] to have her challenges to the partition agreement tried in district court. . . .”
Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Himanshi Raizada v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-himanshi-raizada-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.