In re Hilton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Hilton

901 A.2d 475, 587 Pa. 469

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 20, 2006

DocketNo. 202 DB 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 901 A.2d 475 (In re Hilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hilton, 901 A.2d 475, 587 Pa. 469 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2006, the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 1, 2006, are approved and it is ORDERED that Beth Ann Clark Hilton, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2006, the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 1, 2006, are approved and it is ORDERED that Beth Ann Clark Hilton, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

901 A.2d 475, 587 Pa. 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hilton-pa-2006.