In re Hill

Montana Supreme Court

In re Hill

160 P. 349, 52 Mont. 561, 1916 Mont. LEXIS 94

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 7, 1916

DocketNo. 3,924

StatusPublished

This text of 160 P. 349 (In re Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hill, 160 P. 349, 52 Mont. 561, 1916 Mont. LEXIS 94 (Mo. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The facts in this case are identical with those involved in the application of Jack Palm, just determined. Upon the authority of that decision this proceeding is dismissed and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Missoula county, to be dealt with according to law.

Dismissed.

Mr. Justice Sannbb concurs. Mr. Chief Justice Bbantly, being absent, takes no part in the foregoing decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The facts in this case are identical with those involved in the application of Jack Palm, just determined. Upon the authority of that decision this proceeding is dismissed and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Missoula county, to be dealt with according to law.

Dismissed.

Mr. Justice Sannbb concurs. Mr. Chief Justice Bbantly, being absent, takes no part in the foregoing decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 P. 349, 52 Mont. 561, 1916 Mont. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hill-mont-1916.