In re Hill

Montana Supreme Court

In re Hill

160 P. 349, 52 Mont. 561, 1916 Mont. LEXIS 94

Montana Supreme Court·Decided October 7, 1916·No. No. 3,924·Published

Opinion

MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The facts in this case are identical with those involved in the application of Jack Palm, just determined. Upon the authority of that decision this proceeding is dismissed and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Missoula county, to be dealt with according to law.

Dismissed.

Mr. Justice Sannbb concurs. Mr. Chief Justice Bbantly, being absent, takes no part in the foregoing decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The facts in this case are identical with those involved in the application of Jack Palm, just determined. Upon the authority of that decision this proceeding is dismissed and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Missoula county, to be dealt with according to law.

Dismissed.

Mr. Justice Sannbb concurs. Mr. Chief Justice Bbantly, being absent, takes no part in the foregoing decision.

In re Hill, 160 P. 349, 52 Mont. 561, 1916 Mont. LEXIS 94 (Mo. 1916).

Pincite

160 P. 349 (In re Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.