In re Hill

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Hill

219 Ill. 2d 608

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 2006

DocketMR 20833

StatusPublished

This text of 219 Ill. 2d 608 (In re Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hill, 219 Ill. 2d 608 (Ill. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Danny Ray Hill, who has been disciplined in the State of Indiana, is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Illinois until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Indiana.

Suspension effective June 6, 2006.

Respondent Danny Ray Hill shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Danny Ray Hill, who has been disciplined in the State of Indiana, is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Illinois until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Indiana.

Suspension effective June 6, 2006.

Respondent Danny Ray Hill shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 Ill. 2d 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hill-ill-2006.