In Re Hill

960 A.2d 1138, 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 474, 2008 WL 5082961
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided December 4, 2008·No. 07-BG-1014, 08-BG-77·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petition of the Board on Professional Responsibility pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), to suspend respondent based on disability and Bar Counsel having interposed no objection thereto, it is

ORDERED that respondent is suspended, effective immediately, from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, based on disability pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c), with any reinstatement to be governed by § 13(g), and the one-year period of eligibility for reinstatement should run from the time respondent files the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the reciprocal discipline proceedings in BDN: 41-07 be held in abeyance while respondent is suspended pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Hill, 960 A.2d 1138, 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 474, 2008 WL 5082961 (D.C. 2008).

960 A.2d 1138 (In Re Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Payne
960 A.2d 1138 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2008)