In re Hill

Fourth Circuit

In re Hill

615 F. App'x 800

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2015·No. No. 15-1488·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on Hill’s April 2015 motion to vacate his 2001 criminal judgment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. [801] We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-' quately presented in the materials .before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on Hill’s April 2015 motion to vacate his 2001 criminal judgment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. [801] We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-' quately presented in the materials .before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Hill, 615 F. App'x 800 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

615 F. App'x 800 (In re Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.