In Re: Hill

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1967

In Re: DAVID HILL,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging

the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to

correct judgment. He seeks an order from this court directing

the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus

relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable,

we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of

another mandamus petition if the district court does not act

seasonably. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and

deny Hill’s motion to require a response to the petition. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED