In re Hildebrand

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Hildebrand

32 A.3d 437, 2011 WL 6090092

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 8, 2011

DocketNo. 11-BG-1051

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.3d 437 (In re Hildebrand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hildebrand, 32 A.3d 437, 2011 WL 6090092 (D.C. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

[438]*438ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Virginia State Bar suspending respondent indefinitely from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, this court’s September 16, 2011, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline,

ORDERED that Kenneth E. Hildebrand, Esquire, is hereby suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (re-buttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI