In re Hilburn

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Hilburn

139 So. 3d 990, 2014 WL 2694189, 2014 La. LEXIS 1158

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 16, 2014

DocketNo. 2014-B-0763

StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 3d 990 (In re Hilburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hilburn, 139 So. 3d 990, 2014 WL 2694189, 2014 La. LEXIS 1158 (La. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

It The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent filed a petition for damages for defamation against a defendant based on the defendant’s filing of a disciplinary complaint with the ODC. Respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that James L. Hilburn, Louisiana Bar Roll number 20221, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, [991]*991with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

It The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent filed a petition for damages for defamation against a defendant based on the defendant’s filing of a disciplinary complaint with the ODC. Respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that James L. Hilburn, Louisiana Bar Roll number 20221, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, [991]*991with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 So. 3d 990, 2014 WL 2694189, 2014 La. LEXIS 1158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hilburn-la-2014.