In re Hilburn

139 So. 3d 990, 2014 WL 2694189, 2014 La. LEXIS 1158
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 16, 2014·No. No. 2014-B-0763·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

It The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent filed a petition for damages for defamation against a defendant based on the defendant’s filing of a disciplinary complaint with the ODC. Respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that James L. Hilburn, Louisiana Bar Roll number 20221, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, [991] with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hilburn, 139 So. 3d 990, 2014 WL 2694189, 2014 La. LEXIS 1158 (La. 2014).

139 So. 3d 990 (In re Hilburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.