In re Hilbert

172 A.D.2d 909, 568 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4244

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 22, 1990, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The record supports the conclusion that claimant’s failure to contact the employer when work was available constituted a voluntary leaving of employment without good cause. The evidence established that the employer contacted claimant for his job as a school bus driver for the new school year. Claimant conceded that he told the employer that he was going to Florida to seek work but that he never actually went there and never thereafter contacted the employer about work (see, Matter of Behnke [White Carriage Corp.—Roberts], 97 AD2d 679). Although claimant contended before the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that he left due to stress, the Board could properly have concluded that the medical evidence offered to support this claim was insufficient (see, Matter of Dobrin [Levine] 50 AD2d 657). Accordingly, the decision denying claimant unemployment insurance benefits must be upheld. Claimant’s remaining contentions have been considered and found lacking in merit.

[910] Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hilbert, 172 A.D.2d 909, 568 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

172 A.D.2d 909 (In re Hilbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Dobrin
50 A.D.2d 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Claim of Behnke
97 A.D.2d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)