in Re Hilary Sheard
This text of in Re Hilary Sheard (in Re Hilary Sheard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-19-00060-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE HILARY SHEARD
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam
Relator Hilary Sheard filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause
through which she contends that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding her only
a portion of the attorney’s fees she sought for her representation of Humberto Garza in a
post-conviction writ of habeas corpus in trial court cause number CR-3175-04-G(1) in the
370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. The Court requests that the real parties
in interest, the State of Texas, acting by and through the District Attorney for Hidalgo
County, Texas, and Humberto Garza, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or
before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2,
52.4, 52.8(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 11th day of February, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Hilary Sheard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hilary-sheard-texapp-2019.