In re Highway

7 N.J.L. 37
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 15, 1823
StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.J.L. 37 (In re Highway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Highway, 7 N.J.L. 37 (N.J. 1823).

Opinion

Kiekpateick, O. J.

There is an error in the petition. The petitioners are not to designate to the surveyors the route they are to run. They are to designate only certain points, otherwise they may, by their description, limit tho surveyors to a particular line, and prevent any variation from it.

Bossell, J.,

thought that the description of the route was a necessary part of the application.

Foed, J.

Though an application may be made for two or three distinct roads in the same application, there is nothing in the statute which authorizes the application for one road, to be laid out in one or another of two designated routes.

Proceedings set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 N.J.L. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-highway-nj-1823.