In re Higginson
This text of 685 N.E.2d 1074 (In re Higginson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT
The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, after hearing and review of this case, has tendered to this Court its recommendation upon the Petition for Reinstatement of the respondent, Robert K. Higginson, therein recommending that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law.
And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the respondent has demonstrated, by clear and convincing evidence, compliance with the elements prerequisite to reinstatement to the practice of law as set forth in Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 4(b). Accordingly, we find that the Commission’s recommendation should be followed and the respondent readmitted to the practice of law in this state.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the respondent’s Petition for Reinstatement is granted. Accordingly, he is to be reinstated as a member of the bar of this state, effective immediately.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order to the respondent or his attorney, to the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission, and to all other parties who were notified of the re[1075]*1075spondent’s suspension pursuant to Ad-mis.Dise.R. 23, section 3(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
685 N.E.2d 1074, 1997 Ind. LEXIS 167, 1997 WL 661325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-higginson-ind-1997.