In re Hicks' Will

New York Supreme Court

In re Hicks' Will

2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 143, 4 How. Pr. 316

DecidedFebruary 15, 1850

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 143 (In re Hicks' Will) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hicks' Will, 2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 143, 4 How. Pr. 316 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

JEdmonds, P. J.:

We fully concur with the judge at Special Term. This court has the case merely for the purpose of trying the feigned issue. Eor all other purposes it is in the Surrogate’s Court, and to that it must ultimately go back for final determination — and there the question of revival or abatement properly belongs,

The order of the Special Term must therefore be affirmed, with costs. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JEdmonds, P. J.:

We fully concur with the judge at Special Term. This court has the case merely for the purpose of trying the feigned issue. Eor all other purposes it is in the Surrogate’s Court, and to that it must ultimately go back for final determination — and there the question of revival or abatement properly belongs,

The order of the Special Term must therefore be affirmed, with costs. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 143, 4 How. Pr. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hicks-will-nysupct-1850.