In re Hickman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Hickman

140 So. 3d 711, 2014 WL 2694192, 2014 La. LEXIS 1160

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 16, 2014

DocketNo. 2014-B-0817

StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 3d 711 (In re Hickman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hickman, 140 So. 3d 711, 2014 WL 2694192, 2014 La. LEXIS 1160 (La. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

liThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent misled his client concerning the status of her legal matter. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Darrell K. Hickman, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22797, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. It is further ordered that this suspension shall be deferred in its entirety.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

liThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent misled his client concerning the status of her legal matter. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Darrell K. Hickman, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22797, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. It is further ordered that this suspension shall be deferred in its entirety.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 So. 3d 711, 2014 WL 2694192, 2014 La. LEXIS 1160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hickman-la-2014.