In re Hickman

140 So. 3d 711, 2014 WL 2694192, 2014 La. LEXIS 1160
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Hickman. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 So. 3d 460
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 16, 2014·No. No. 2014-B-0817·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

liThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent misled his client concerning the status of her legal matter. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Darrell K. Hickman, Louisiana Bar Roll number 22797, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. It is further ordered that this suspension shall be deferred in its entirety.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hickman, 140 So. 3d 711, 2014 WL 2694192, 2014 La. LEXIS 1160 (La. 2014).

140 So. 3d 711 (In re Hickman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.