In re Hewlett-Packard Co.

471 F. App'x 898
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 21, 2012·No. Miscellaneous Docket No. 124·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) petitions for a writ of mandamus to direct the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas to vacate its order denying HP’s motion to sever and transfer. Lodsys, LLC and Lodsys Group, LLC (“Lodsys”) oppose.

In In re EMC, 677 F.3d 1351 (Fed.Cir. 2012), we recently set forth the standard for assessing a motion to sever under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21(a).

We deem it the better course for HP to first move the district court for reconsideration of its order denying HP’s motion to sever and transfer in light of our decision in In re EMC. We therefore deny HP’s petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice to refiling.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hewlett-Packard Co., 471 F. App'x 898 (Fed. Cir. 2012).

471 F. App'x 898 (In re Hewlett-Packard Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re DISH NETWORK L.L.C.
Federal Circuit, 2021