In re Herron

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Herron

670 A.2d 1123

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 19, 1995

DocketNo. 150 Disciplinary Docket No. 3; Board File No. C1-95-675

StatusPublished

This text of 670 A.2d 1123 (In re Herron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Herron, 670 A.2d 1123 (Pa. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 1995, Steven F. Herron having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of one year by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated May 18, 1995; the said Steven F. Herron having been directed on October 16, 1995, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Steven F. Herron is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of one year, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

MONTEMURO, J., participates by designation as a senior judge as provided by Pa.R.JA. No. 701(f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 1995, Steven F. Herron having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of one year by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated May 18, 1995; the said Steven F. Herron having been directed on October 16, 1995, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Steven F. Herron is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of one year, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

MONTEMURO, J., participates by designation as a senior judge as provided by Pa.R.JA. No. 701(f).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

670 A.2d 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-herron-pa-1995.