In re Herrington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Herrington

26 A.D.2d 794, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3488

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 794 (In re Herrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Herrington, 26 A.D.2d 794, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3488 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed and relief granted in accordance with memorandum. Memorandum: Appellant is entitled to receive copies of all pretrial statements and portions of the Grand Jury testimony of witnesses who testified at the trial and which statements and transcripts of testimony were made available to defense counsel upon the trial for the purpose of cross-examination of said witnesses (cf. People v. Jaglom, 17 N Y 2d 162). The District Attorney is directed to make such material available to appellant’s assigned counsel who upon oral argument agreed to make copies thereof for use by appellant. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court denying, without a hearing, motion for free copies of various papers filed in Monroe Cotinty Clerk’s office.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed and relief granted in accordance with memorandum. Memorandum: Appellant is entitled to receive copies of all pretrial statements and portions of the Grand Jury testimony of witnesses who testified at the trial and which statements and transcripts of testimony were made available to defense counsel upon the trial for the purpose of cross-examination of said witnesses (cf. People v. Jaglom, 17 N Y 2d 162). The District Attorney is directed to make such material available to appellant’s assigned counsel who upon oral argument agreed to make copies thereof for use by appellant. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court denying, without a hearing, motion for free copies of various papers filed in Monroe Cotinty Clerk’s office.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 794, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-herrington-nyappdiv-1966.