In re Hernandez

298 F. 1019, 54 App. D.C. 404, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2742
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 2, 1924
DocketPatent Appeal No. 1663
StatusPublished

This text of 298 F. 1019 (In re Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Hernandez, 298 F. 1019, 54 App. D.C. 404, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2742 (D.C. Cir. 1924).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office

tribunals refusing to allow this reissue' application with broader claims, it having been filed almost three years after the issuance of the original patent. The Patent Office tribunals have carefully considered the facts and have found that no special circumstances have been shown to excuse the delay. We concur in this finding. See In re Starkey, 21 App. D. C. 519, In re Ams, 29 App. D. C. 91, and In re Otto, 259 Fed. 985, 49 App. D. C. 89. The decision is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Otto
259 F. 985 (District of Columbia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 F. 1019, 54 App. D.C. 404, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hernandez-cadc-1924.