In re Herlong

781 S.E.2d 913, 415 S.C. 274, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 42
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 27, 2016·No. Appellate Case Nos. 2015-001664; 2016-000101·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), with respondent’s consent, petitions this Court to transfer respondent to incapac[275] ity inactive status pursuant to Rule 28(f) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). In addition, ODC requests the Court lift respondent’s interim suspension since the criminal charges against him have been resolved. See In the Matter of Herlong, 413 S.C. 232, 776 S.E.2d 86 (2015).

IT IS ORDERED that respondent is transferred to incapacity inactive status until further order of this Court.

Since the criminal charges against respondent have been resolved, the Court lifts respondent’s interim suspension.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Herlong, 781 S.E.2d 913, 415 S.C. 274, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 42 (S.C. 2016).

781 S.E.2d 913 (In re Herlong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Robert W. Herlong
785 S.E.2d 784 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2016)