In re Herlong

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Herlong

781 S.E.2d 913, 415 S.C. 274, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 42

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJanuary 27, 2016

DocketAppellate Case Nos. 2015-001664; 2016-000101

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 781 S.E.2d 913 (In re Herlong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Herlong, 781 S.E.2d 913, 415 S.C. 274, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 42 (S.C. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), with respondent’s consent, petitions this Court to transfer respondent to incapac[275]*275ity inactive status pursuant to Rule 28(f) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). In addition, ODC requests the Court lift respondent’s interim suspension since the criminal charges against him have been resolved. See In the Matter of Herlong, 413 S.C. 232, 776 S.E.2d 86 (2015).

IT IS ORDERED that respondent is transferred to incapacity inactive status until further order of this Court.

Since the criminal charges against respondent have been resolved, the Court lifts respondent’s interim suspension.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), with respondent’s consent, petitions this Court to transfer respondent to incapac[275]*275ity inactive status pursuant to Rule 28(f) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). In addition, ODC requests the Court lift respondent’s interim suspension since the criminal charges against him have been resolved. See In the Matter of Herlong, 413 S.C. 232, 776 S.E.2d 86 (2015).

IT IS ORDERED that respondent is transferred to incapacity inactive status until further order of this Court.

Since the criminal charges against respondent have been resolved, the Court lifts respondent’s interim suspension.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

781 S.E.2d 913, 415 S.C. 274, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-herlong-sc-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack